Rules & transparency
Clarity and accessibility of official rules, eligibility, currency explanations, promotional terms, and material limitations.
Open methodology
PrizeLens scores are designed as compact research signals. This page shows the categories, evidence standards, uncertainty rules, and affiliate separation behind them.
Clarity and accessibility of official rules, eligibility, currency explanations, promotional terms, and material limitations.
Visibility of prize eligibility, minimums, verification steps, payment options, processing expectations, and material restrictions.
Availability and clarity of current AMOE or other no-purchase participation instructions, including limits and deadlines.
Usability, information architecture, mobile accessibility, account controls, and the clarity of support pathways.
Operator history, consistency of published information, responsiveness to material changes, and available evidence—not popularity alone.
Total possible score: 100 points. Category weights may be refined when methodology changes are documented and materially justified.
Evidence standard
Not rated is intentional
PrizeLens may display “Not rated” when there is not enough current evidence to apply the methodology responsibly. It does not automatically mean the operator is unsafe or poor; it means the score is being withheld until the required information can be supported.
A casino can have an affiliate link and remain unrated or receive a lower score. Compensation does not purchase points or a guaranteed placement.
Rules, availability, redemption processes, and evidence change. Scores may be revised when material information is reverified.
Send a current official source to contact.prizelens@gmail.com. We evaluate the evidence, not the sender's commercial status.